React is easy to start and expensive to get wrong. We build React applications where the rendering strategy is a decision rather than a default, the bundle has a budget, and the state layer still makes sense to the team that inherits it. $40 to $100 per hour, published.
Live products for named clients built with this work: the problem, what shipped, and the decisions that mattered.
A React rewrite rarely fails on syntax. It fails because every route was made a client component, because the server cache and the UI state were put in the same store, and because nobody owned a performance budget until the app was already slow. By then the fix is architectural and the budget is spent.
We make those three decisions explicitly at the start and write them down: what renders on the server, what the bundle is allowed to weigh, and where data lives. The result is an application a second team can pick up without a rewrite, which is the only definition of maintainable that survives contact with a handover.
Six pieces of work, described so you can tell whether we have done them before.
Get the hour band before you get a proposal
Tell us the routes, the data sources and whether SEO matters on any of them. That is enough for a range on the first call.
Every agency lists the same bullet points. What follows is where React pays for itself, and where it is the wrong tool and we will say so.
Unlike traditional services, we use the best methods to quickly and efficiently create advanced technology solutions. Our approach ensures not only speed but also quality, guaranteeing that your project reaches its full potential.
Rates are $40 to $100 per hour by role. Component build and markup sit near the floor. Rendering architecture, performance work and migration of a large legacy app sit near the ceiling. A mixed team blends to $60 to $70, and that blend is the number worth planning against rather than either end of the band.
We do not give a fixed price before discovery, because a figure quoted before the route and data inventory exists is fiction, and you would be paying a padding premium for our uncertainty. You will get an hour band on the first call. Hourly, part time or full time, and the code sits in your repository from day one.
Inherited a React app nobody wants to touch?
Send us the repository and the three screens that are slowest. We will tell you whether it is a refactor or a rewrite.
Five commitments written so they are checkable rather than flattering. If any of them is not what you want from a partner, better to know now than after a proposal.
Rates are $40 to $100 per hour by role, blending to $60 to $70 on a mixed team. Component build and markup sit near the floor; rendering architecture, performance work and large legacy migrations sit near the ceiling. We give an hour band on the first call and a fixed price only after discovery, because any number quoted before the route and data inventory exists is padded for our own uncertainty rather than priced for your project.
On specifics, not on a portfolio. Ask what their Largest Contentful Paint budget is and where it is enforced, how they decide which routes are client components, how they separate server cache from client state, and what their plan is when a dependency goes unmaintained. Those four answers separate teams that have maintained a React app from teams that have launched one.
If any page has to rank in search or load fast on a first visit, you want server rendering, which means a framework. Bare React is a reasonable choice for an application behind a login where every user is authenticated and SEO is irrelevant. We make that call per project and explain the trade before you commit.
Yes, and it is a large part of what we do. We start with a read-only review: dependency age, bundle composition, render profiles on the three slowest screens, and test coverage. That produces either a refactor plan with sequenced work or an honest recommendation to rewrite behind a routing boundary. You get the review as a document whether or not you continue with us.
For stateful interfaces, yes. The ecosystem, the hiring pool and the tooling are all deep, and the component model has not been beaten for complex UI. For a mostly static marketing site it is the wrong tool and always was. The question is not whether React is good, it is whether your application is the kind of thing React is for.
We test on a throttled mid-range Android profile rather than a developer laptop, set a byte ceiling on the critical bundle, and treat hydration cost as a budget line. React ships a runtime and a hydration step, and on a slow phone on a slow network that is a real tax. Pretending otherwise is how apps ship fast in the office and slow in the field.
Hourly, part time, full time dedicated developers, or a fixed price per phase after discovery. Dedicated developers work in your tools and your standups. For a fixed price we need the route and data inventory first.
Yes, including the part most vendors leave out: scheduled dependency and major version upgrades with a test suite behind them. An app three majors behind is not a maintenance ticket, it is a project, and the way to avoid that is to never get there.
Yes, route by route behind a boundary so both apps ship side by side and you keep releasing throughout. We do not run long-lived rewrite branches, because they do not merge. If your current app is working and the only complaint is the framework name, we will say that migration is not worth the money.
You do, from the first commit, in your repository, with hosting and analytics accounts in your name. Infrastructure is defined as code so another team can stand it up without us.
Real feedback from the people we've proudly partnered with.
Sales Director |Cintas
United States
Zyneto Global Technologies provided excellent project management and technical expertise throughout the engagement. The team was responsive, collaborative, and adaptive, ensuring the project met our expectations and set a strong foundation for future growth.
Founder & CEO |Moneteo
We engaged Zyneto to design and develop a custom web platform for Moneteo, aimed at improving project management, data tracking, and collaboration across internal teams and external partners. Their work included full-stack web development, custom modules for workflow automation, API integration, and comprehensive testing.
CEO |E-Commerce Platform
Overall, their responsiveness and timely deliveries contributed positively to the project's success. The client achieved better data management and quality. The service provider delivered the project on time and ensured prompt responsiveness throughout the engagement. Their innovative approach was outstanding.
Practical guides and analysis on reactjs development, written by the team that builds it.
