Published rates
$40 to $100 per hour by seniority, on the page rather than behind a form. Mixed squads blend to roughly $60 to $70.
Thirty three services across AI, mobile, web, backend and infrastructure. Rates run $40 to $100 per hour by seniority and they are published on every page, so you can size the work before anyone sends you a proposal.






All services
Six groups covering thirty three services. Each page states what we build, what it costs in hours, and where the approach stops being the right one.
Model selection, retrieval, agents and the evaluation suite that tells you whether any of it is working.
Packaged AI products rather than research projects: assistants, document systems and automation that runs unattended.
Native and cross platform, with the offline behaviour, store review and device fragmentation planned in rather than discovered.
Rendering strategy, Core Web Vitals and the framework choice argued from your traffic pattern instead of from fashion.
APIs, schemas and pipelines. The part that decides whether the product still works at ten times the volume.
Blockchain, IoT, design and delivery pipelines. Useful where the constraint is real, and we will say when it is not.
Choosing
Thirty three pages is a lot to read. These two questions take about a minute and usually narrow it to one.
Not what you want built. The bit you already suspect will go wrong.
First we prove it can. Then we build tests that show whether the output is good enough to put in front of a customer.
That is a different problem. The work is in error handling, cost per run, and what happens when a file arrives in the wrong format at 3am.
Offline use, app store review, and the older Android phones your users actually carry.
How pages render, Core Web Vitals, and how much of the page can be static.
Database design, APIs, and what breaks at ten times the traffic. This is the most common answer. It is also the one people skip.
A shared record that several companies must trust. Physical devices sending data. A design system. A deployment pipeline. If a plain database would do the job, we will say so.
Each group has one general page and several named ones. Web Development sits next to Next.js, React.js, Node.js and Angular. Python sits next to Django, Flask and FastAPI. Mobile App Development sits next to Flutter, React Native, iOS and Android.
Pick this when the technology is already chosen. It covers how we work in it, what it costs, and when it is the wrong fit.
Pick this when the technology is not chosen yet. It works through the options based on your traffic and your team. Choosing Next.js before anyone looks at your traffic is the wrong order, and it costs a lot to undo.
If two pages both fit, read either. They overlap on purpose. The rate band is the same and the first conversation covers both.
None of these pages tells you whether to keep it. Ask for an audit. Often the answer is that the code is fine and you need two weeks of work, not a rebuild.
If the hold-up is a procurement checklist or a security review, tell us first. It changes who you meet and it changes the estimate.
That is normal. Send us the part you think is hardest. We will tell you which of the thirty three fits, or tell you that none of them do.
How an engagement runs
Whichever service you start from, the commercial terms and the delivery shape do not change.
$40 to $100 per hour by seniority, on the page rather than behind a form. Mixed squads blend to roughly $60 to $70.
You get an hour band and the arithmetic first. A fixed price follows once the integration surface is actually known.
Code lands in your repository and every cloud, gateway and vendor account is created in your name from day one.
Where a platform, an existing codebase or a smaller change is the better answer, that is what we will tell you.
Chosen for the constraint in front of us, not for what is fashionable this year.
Rates run $40 to $100 per hour depending on role and seniority. QA and junior implementation sit near the floor, architecture and specialist engineering near the ceiling, and a mixed squad blends to roughly $60 to $70. The rate is on every service page rather than behind a form.
No. We give an hour band and the arithmetic behind it, then a fixed number once discovery has established the integration surface. A quote produced before anyone has counted the integrations is a guess, and it is usually the client who pays for the difference.
Yes. Most service pages cover both: a fixed scope engagement with a defined outcome, or dedicated engineers who join your team and report into your process. The rate band is the same either way.
You do, from the first commit. Work happens in your repository where you have one, and cloud, gateway and third party accounts are created in your name. There is no handover event at the end because there is nothing to hand over.
Start from the constraint rather than the technology. If the hard part is the data model, the backend pages are the right read. If it is a security review or a procurement checklist, start there instead. If you are unsure, send us the part of the problem you think is hardest and we will tell you which of these it actually is.
Frequently, and it is usually cheaper than a rebuild. We will audit what is there and tell you plainly when the honest answer is to keep it, refactor part of it, or replace it. Recommending a rebuild that is not needed is the easiest way for an agency to bill more, so we try to be explicit about that.
Real feedback from the people we've proudly partnered with.
Sales Director |Cintas
United States
Zyneto Global Technologies provided excellent project management and technical expertise throughout the engagement. The team was responsive, collaborative, and adaptive, ensuring the project met our expectations and set a strong foundation for future growth.
Founder & CEO |Moneteo
We engaged Zyneto to design and develop a custom web platform for Moneteo, aimed at improving project management, data tracking, and collaboration across internal teams and external partners. Their work included full-stack web development, custom modules for workflow automation, API integration, and comprehensive testing.
CEO |E-Commerce Platform
Overall, their responsiveness and timely deliveries contributed positively to the project's success. The client achieved better data management and quality. The service provider delivered the project on time and ensured prompt responsiveness throughout the engagement. Their innovative approach was outstanding.
Send us the part you think is hardest.
Engineering notes from the same teams that deliver these services.